Table of Contents
For generations, Christians have heard the words of Jesus concerning the broad road and the narrow way. Most have been taught that Jesus was describing two roads leading to two eternal destinations. The broad road supposedly represents the majority of humanity traveling toward an everlasting burning hell, while the narrow road represents the relatively few who will eventually make it to heaven.
But what if we have been overlooking the historical context in which Jesus spoke these words?
What if Jesus was warning the very generation standing before Him about the destruction that was rapidly approaching Jerusalem?
And what if the narrow way represented those who believed in Him, entered into life through faith, and ultimately escaped the terrible judgment that came upon their nation?
When we examine the words of Jesus alongside His other warnings concerning Jerusalem, the connection becomes remarkable.
THE BROAD ROAD THAT LEADS TO DESTRUCTION
Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat:
Matthew 7:13
Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.
Matthew 7:14
Jesus was speaking to a Jewish audience living under the Old Covenant. He was not addressing twenty-first-century Christianity. He was speaking to people whose nation, religious leadership, temple, and covenantal system were approaching a tremendous judgment.
The broad road was the path that many within Israel were already traveling. It was the path of unbelief, religious pride, and rejection of the Messiah.
The narrow way was the way of faith in Jesus Christ.
Notice that Jesus did not simply contrast heaven and hell. He contrasted destruction and life.
The Greek word translated destruction is apōleia. It carries the meaning of destruction, ruin, or loss. The word itself does not require the idea of eternal conscious torment.
And when we examine the warnings Jesus gave concerning His own generation, we discover that destruction was precisely what He said was coming.
JESUS WARNED THAT JERUSALEM WOULD BE DESTROYED
O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!
Matthew 23:37
Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.
Matthew 23:38
Consider the language Jesus used.
He wanted to gather Jerusalem’s children, but they would not come to Him.
There was a way of deliverance available, but the nation, particularly its religious leadership, continued down the path of rejection.
Jesus then declared that their house would be left desolate.
This was not a warning about an event thousands of years into the future. Jesus identified the generation upon whom this judgment would fall.
Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation.
Matthew 23:36
That generation would experience the consequences of rejecting their Messiah.
The broad road was crowded, but its destination was destruction.
THE MAJORITY REJECTED THE WAY OF LIFE
He came unto his own, and his own received him not.
John 1:11
But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:
John 1:12
John presents a striking contrast.
Jesus came to His own people, yet many rejected Him. But those who received Him through faith became the children of God.
We see the same distinction in the broad and narrow ways.
The majority continued in unbelief, while those who believed entered into the life Christ offered.
Jesus made the contrast even clearer when speaking to the religious leaders.
And ye will not come to me, that ye might have life.
John 5:40
The problem was not that life was unavailable. The problem was that they refused to come to the One who offered it.
The broad road was the way of rejecting Christ.
The narrow way was the way of believing in Him.
And these two paths would have profoundly different consequences as the Old Covenant age approached its end.
THE NARROW WAY WAS THE WAY OF LIFE THROUGH FAITH
Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.
John 5:24
Notice the present reality of Jesus’ statement.
Those who believed had everlasting life.
They had already passed from death unto life.
Life was not something they would receive merely by escaping Jerusalem or surviving the Roman armies. They entered into life through faith in Jesus Christ.
Jesus Himself was the way.
Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
John 14:6
The narrow way was not a geographical road leading out of Judea. It was Christ Himself.
Nevertheless, those who followed Christ also received His warnings concerning the approaching destruction of Jerusalem.
Their faith had both spiritual and historical consequences.
They entered into life through believing, and many were also delivered from the physical destruction that overtook the city.
THE NARROW WAY AND THE REMNANT
Throughout Israel’s history, God preserved a remnant of those who believed.
Paul explained that this same principle was operating during his own generation.
Even so then at this present time also there is a remnant according to the election of grace.
Romans 11:5
Notice Paul’s words: at this present time.
He was speaking about a remnant existing in his own day.
This corresponds with the distinction Jesus made between the many traveling the broad road and the few finding the narrow way.
The remnant was not saved by their own righteousness or by their ability to escape Jerusalem. They were saved by grace through faith.
The narrow way and the remnant point us toward the same first-century contrast: many within Israel rejected Christ, while a comparatively small number believed.
And when judgment finally came upon Jerusalem, that distinction became historically significant.
WHEN YOU SEE JERUSALEM SURROUNDED BY ARMIES
And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh.
Luke 21:20
Then let them which are in Judaea flee to the mountains; and let them which are in the midst of it depart out; and let not them that are in the countries enter thereinto.
Luke 21:21
For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled.
Luke 21:22
Jesus warned His disciples about the approaching destruction of Jerusalem and told them exactly what to do when they recognized the signs.
They were to flee.
They were not to remain in the city expecting divine protection while the Roman armies surrounded Jerusalem.
They were not to take up arms to defend the temple.
They were to leave.
Those who believed Jesus had reason to recognize His warning and obey His instructions.
This is where the connection between the narrow way and the preservation of believers becomes especially powerful.
The way of life was faith in Christ, and that same faith led His followers to heed His warning concerning the destruction that was coming.
THE CHRISTIANS WHO FLED TO PELLA
Early Christian history preserves a remarkable account of believers escaping Jerusalem before its destruction.
The fourth-century historian Eusebius, in his Ecclesiastical History, Book 3, Chapter 5, records a tradition that members of the Jerusalem church were instructed to leave the city before the war and settle in Pella, a city beyond the Jordan River.
Pella was located east of the Jordan, outside Jerusalem and the immediate area of the siege.
This historical tradition is consistent with the warning Jesus gave His disciples to flee Judea when they recognized the approaching desolation.
We should recognize that Eusebius wrote long after the events, and the precise number of Christians who escaped is unknown. Nevertheless, the account preserves an important early Christian understanding that believers heeded the warning and departed before Jerusalem fell.
Think about the contrast.
While many remained committed to defending Jerusalem and its temple, believers who recognized the words of Jesus had been warned to flee.
One path led toward a city destined for destruction.
The other led away from that destruction.
And the difference was rooted in whether they believed the words of Christ.
THE TERRIBLE DESTRUCTION OF JERUSALEM
In AD 70, the Roman armies under Titus besieged Jerusalem.
The Jewish historian Flavius Josephus, who witnessed the war and wrote extensively about its horrors, described famine, internal violence, slaughter, and the eventual destruction of the temple.
In The Jewish War, Book 6, Chapter 9, Section 3, Josephus reported approximately 1,100,000 deaths during the siege and 97,000 captives taken during the war.
Those numbers are disputed by modern historians and should not be treated as verified totals. Nevertheless, Josephus’ account makes clear that the destruction was catastrophic.
Jerusalem was devastated.
The temple was burned.
The sacrificial system ceased.
Many inhabitants were killed, while others were carried away as prisoners.
Jesus had already warned of this very judgment.
For there shall be great distress in the land, and wrath upon this people.
Luke 21:23
And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.
Luke 21:24
Notice how precisely the language corresponds with the historical events.
Jesus warned of the sword.
Josephus recorded the slaughter.
Jesus warned of captivity.
Josephus recorded the captives.
Jesus warned that Jerusalem would be trampled by the Gentiles.
The Roman armies conquered and devastated the city.
This was real destruction, involving real people, physical death, and the collapse of the Old Covenant religious order centered in Jerusalem.
The broad road had reached its destination.
DESTRUCTION WAS BOTH PHYSICAL AND COVENANTAL
We should not overlook the spiritual significance of what happened in AD 70.
Jerusalem’s destruction was not simply a military defeat. It marked the decisive judgment upon the Old Covenant order that had rejected its Messiah.
Paul described the Mosaic administration in language that deserves careful attention.
But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away:
2 Corinthians 3:7
Paul called it the ministration of death.
He also described its glory as something that was passing away.
The contrast was between the Old Covenant administration and the life-giving ministry of the Spirit under the New Covenant.
The physical destruction of Jerusalem was the historical judgment associated with the end of that former covenantal order.
Those who remained in unbelief continued under an administration that could not give them life.
Those who believed in Christ had entered the New Covenant, where righteousness and life were found through Him.
This is why the broad and narrow ways should not be reduced merely to two geographical routes or two different ways of escaping physical death.
The issue was much deeper.
It concerned two covenantal realities: remaining in unbelief under the old administration of death or entering into life through Jesus Christ.
And when Jerusalem fell, the physical destruction dramatically revealed the seriousness of that covenantal transition.
JESUS HAD WARNED ABOUT THE SAME DESTRUCTION BEFORE
There is another passage that closely parallels the broad and narrow ways.
Jesus told a parable about a vineyard and its wicked husbandmen. They rejected the servants sent to them and eventually killed the owner’s son.
Jesus then asked what the owner would do to those husbandmen.
They say unto him, He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the fruits in their seasons.
Matthew 21:41
Jesus then declared:
Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.
Matthew 21:43
The religious leaders understood that Jesus was speaking about them.
And when the chief priests and Pharisees had heard his parables, they perceived that he spake of them.
Matthew 21:45
Notice the pattern.
There was rejection of God’s messengers.
There was rejection of the Son.
There was a coming destruction.
And there was a transfer of covenantal privilege to those who would bear fruit.
The religious leaders understood the warning because Jesus was addressing their own circumstances.
This same historical setting helps us understand the seriousness of the broad road leading to destruction.
Jesus was repeatedly warning Israel that rejecting Him would have devastating consequences.
THE TWO WAYS WERE SET BEFORE THAT GENERATION
Jesus did not leave His audience without warning.
He called them to repentance.
He called them to believe.
He called them to enter through the narrow gate.
And He repeatedly warned that judgment was approaching.
Consider another statement from the Sermon on the Mount.
Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
Matthew 7:19
This sounds remarkably similar to the warning John the Baptist had already delivered to Israel.
And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: therefore every tree which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
Matthew 3:10
John warned that the axe was already laid to the root.
Jesus warned that the fruitless tree would be cut down.
These were not disconnected teachings. Both were delivered within the same first-century covenantal setting.
The judgment was approaching.
Israel was being confronted with the Messiah.
The question was whether they would believe in Him or continue in unbelief.
The broad road represented the path of rejection that led toward destruction.
The narrow way represented life through faith in Jesus Christ.
THE ROAD TO DESTRUCTION AND THE WAY OF LIFE
When we place Matthew 7 alongside Matthew 23–24, Luke 21, John 5, and the historical destruction of Jerusalem, a consistent picture begins to emerge.
Jesus was warning His generation.
The majority within Israel rejected Him.
A remnant believed.
Those who believed entered into life through faith, passing from death unto life.
And when the Roman armies came against Jerusalem, the warnings Jesus had given became a matter of physical life and death as well.
The destruction was not imaginary.
The suffering was not symbolic.
The slaughter was real.
The captivity was real.
The burning of Jerusalem and its temple was real.
But so was the life that Jesus offered to those who believed.
That life was not limited to surviving a Roman siege. It was the everlasting life of the New Covenant, a life that could not be destroyed by Rome or taken away by physical death.
CONCLUSION: WHICH ROAD WAS JESUS WARNING THEM ABOUT?
For too long, Matthew 7:13–14 has often been presented as though Jesus were simply telling humanity that most people throughout history would end up in an everlasting burning hell.
But consider what was happening when He spoke those words.
He was standing among the people of Israel.
Their religious leaders were rejecting Him.
Their covenantal age was approaching its end.
And He was warning them that destruction was coming.
Within that historical setting, the broad road takes on tremendous significance.
Many continued down the road of unbelief, a road that ultimately led to the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70.
The narrow way was Jesus Christ Himself. Those who believed in Him entered into life, and those who heeded His warnings could also escape the physical destruction that overtook the city.
The broad road led to destruction.
The narrow way led to life.
One was the path of rejecting the Messiah.
The other was the way of faith in Him.
And for that first-century generation, the consequences were not merely theological. They became a devastating historical reality.
The question we should be asking is not simply where these roads lead in our modern religious traditions.
The question is what those words meant to the people who first heard Jesus speak them.
When we begin with His audience, His generation, and the judgment He repeatedly warned them about, the broad road and the narrow way become part of the same powerful message that runs throughout His ministry.
Life was found in Christ. Destruction awaited the generation that rejected Him.
